ES 2007S is definitely one of
the courses whereby I experienced the deepest learning curve. The peer teaching
has been useful. I find topics such as how to write business letters
effectively, how to convey good news and bad news, how to manage cultural
conflicts and how to prepare for an interview particularly relevant and
helpful.
Valuable though other aspects
of the course are, I feel that I benefited most from the many opportunities that
I have to speak and present to an audience in this class. These hands-on
experiences has markedly improved my oral presentation skills and it is thus
that I choose to reflect on this one area of communication skill in my final
blog entry.
While my last presentation on
Singapore’s birthrate was far from perfect and there are definitely areas that
I can work on, I believe I have come a long way. I remember that in my very
first dry run of my peer teaching on communication channel, Professor Jaidev
and my fellow classmates commented that my demeanor was too relax, and
sometimes it may come across as arrogance. This is an invaluable feedback as
never would I worry about looking arroganct when in fact I am so stressed and
nervous on stage.
I believe the fact that I
look arrogant is primarily due to my informal tone of voice and my slouching
posture. In my second peer teaching on Good News/ Bad News, I took note of that
and was told that I have improved. Still, my presentation then was far from
seasoned. I have always been a nervous speaker and my nervousness is reflected
in my body language. My hand gestures were very loose and jerky, I fidgeted
right from the beginning and I still slouched. Furthermore, I also tend to find
comfort in the screen. In many occasions, I unintentionally, spoke to the screen
rather than to the audience and in three occasions, namely when I did the
exercise, shared the Boston College Rejection letter and explained the Cookery
example, I read straight from the screen. The former is due to a lack of
confidence and the latter due to the lack of consideration when making the PowerPoint. I should have been more aware of how
long the examples were and extracted only the main points.
In terms of delivery, I also
had a lot of room for improvement. In my second peer teaching, I started
speaking while I was still moving to the centre of the stage. In general, I
could have had more eye contact with the audience and have eye contact with
more of the audience (I tend to focus on the right hand side). Furthermore, I
also slurred on some occasions, particularly when I felt like I was repeating
or when I think the audience knew what I wanted to say. For example, I slurred
while saying “then you carry on with your main idea…you can prepare for your orientation
camp by” or while saying “…you can position the negative information in the
middle of the body...so as to reduce the emphasis on it”. Not only did it sound
unprofessional, it was also wrong to assume that the audience knew what you
were saying.
In terms of inflections, my voice tended to
be rather monotonous, although to my credit, I tried to sound more dynamic by
using “oh”s (e.g. when I was saying “Oh, we only serve in specific locations
such as…”.) Upon listening to my delivery on video, however, I felt that it was
too informal.
Keeping in mind that I should only talk
when I am in the centre of the stage and facing the audience, avoid reading
from the screen, have bolder and more confident body gestures, my third presentation
was a marked improvement from the last. I spoke only when I was ready, and my
opening was also more impactful and a clearer transition from the last speaker
in that it was able to induce a few laughter.
I was also much more confident in terms of
body language. I did not slouch or fidget. My hand gestures were bigger and
more definite. I was able to use my hands to emphasize statistics, (e.g. “over
50%...”). In addition, I made use of Professor Jaidev’s suggestion to use
pauses and signposts when I say “Next, let us talk about gender differences”. I
also had more tonal inflection and was able to stress on certain words.
However, I still lack in many
areas. For example, I still spend too much at the screen and I still hadn’t broken the habit of speaking to the screen. While my eye contact with the audience improved as the
presentation went on, I focus too much on the right side. When passing the time on to Bernice, I also kept my eyes on
my group mates rather than the audience.
Last but not least, although I
was quite fluent in general, I appeared a bit flustered when I explained how
our survey consist mostly of dichotomous and check the box answers (4:45-4:53).
ES 2007S has been an
invaluable course to me and I shall continue strive to become a better speaker.